LGBTQ and Gender

Moreover we should support Women's rights because our mothers are (or were if they died) women and they gave birth to us and many of our spouses or friends are women

Personally, I am indifferent on same sex marriage

Systematically, I do not support same sex marriage being legal. Systematically, I have moderate and persuasive arguments for why same sex marriage should not be legal that a lot of gays and pro same sex marriage liberals would have difficulty debunking.   I hope that makes conservatives happy, I enjoy the attention 

Legality wise, I oscillate between being between abstention-present (like voting 'present' in congress to the effect of abstention) and forth political position on same sex marriage being legal and me supporting same sex marriage being legal only because I am a Paleoconservative who is an ally of the Republicans and being a Paleolibertarianism and Republican (or Republican ally) is all about being small government and keeping the government out of peoples' lives,

Off the record, I want same sex marriage to stay legal, and for it to be legal everywhere it is currently not legal (and don't take away any gay rights) but at the same time, have the word marriage in the term straight marriage be changed to a different word that shows that straight marriage is more ‘real and moral’ than same sex marriage and have new things added to straight marriage ceremonies to show that straight weddings are more ‘legit’ than same sex weddings along with adding more rights for married straight couples that they and same sex couples currently don't have now (to show that straight marriage is a unique form of marriage). 

These added rights and changes to straight marriage ceremonies and straight marriages would seriously downplay same sex  marriage in comparison with straight marriage while not going 'backward' on same sex marriage (ie without taking anything away from same sex marriage ceremonies or from the rights of gay married couples) in such a way that same sex marriage would feel as ‘illegitimate’ in comparison to straight marriage in the same way that same sex couples who had no couple rights in the 1970s 1980s 1990s, 2000s (in some places) felt compared to straight marriage in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s 

I want privatized marriage to replace all current forms of marriage for straight couples and same sex couples and be legal for straight couples and same sex couples (meaning having privatized marriage being the only legal form of marriage)

One reason I am not pro gay is because in the future the Left Wing Progressives, Liberals and Democrats will turn on gays and say that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including same sex marriage) are wrong from a Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal perspective so by me not being pro gay, I am having a futuristic Left Wing, Progressive and Liberal stance on the gay issue

If we destroy this bourgeois, patriarchal, hetereosexist, cissexist, white ethnocentric hierarchal system ,whites, BIPOC+,  LGBTQ people, men, women etc will all have a fresh equal start where there will be no arbitrary lines which divide us by sex, gender, orientation, race-ethnicity etc. 

In fact the lines would be blurred under this new non hierarchal equal system where it would be impossible to be a bigot (it would like we would all literally be identity blind).It would be a system without roles, without identity politics, without equity, without parity but true NATURAL equality that can only be reached by destroying this bourgeois patriarchal, hetereosexist, cissexist,white ethnocentric hierarchal system that the governments and media etc use to divide us and label us for their own personal gains. 

Under this new system, you can watch a A list film and not be upset when you see a transgender transracial BIPOC as the lead because it will be natural and there will be barely any lines between said lead actor and anyone who would normally be offended by such an arbitrary thing due to how open , free and equal this post hierarchal, post patriarchal ,post hereosexist, post cissexist , post white ethnocentric system would be. 

No more being labeled phobe or racist or sexist etc. No more SJW freaks , no more quotas, no more 5th wave or 6th wave (or any wave) feminists. The lion will lay with the lamb. True identity blind society

I believe that the government/state should stay out of enforcing moral changes in at least some to more than most situations. Moral evolution can happen many times apart of the government/state and relations between people can emerge with freedom from the government/state. Most relationships in life should not be characterized as conflict as the left and right might have it. It's good to have mutual and humane respect for others as individuals.   It's also good to do positive and unselfish things without having to grapple with the political ramifications of doing those positive things.

I am copying this from Marxists.org because I fully agree with it (but for Center Right-Right Wing reasons) so I want to echo it , I want want the things below to become a reality in our society ASAP .

My reason is , if we can’t stop LGBTQ and feminists from creating equity and parity in our Christian, moral, traditional albeit sadly patriarchal cissexist heterosexist system, then we should destroy our traditional system to protect it from that wokeness  (if that traditional is replaced it can’t become woke or  via parity and equity) and usher in a new hierarchy less system as noted below where everyone is equal from the start and where Conservatives won’t notice or care that LGBTQ and women are equal with them in this new non patriarchal, non cissexist, non heterosexist system. 

Let those LGBTQ and radical feminists have their dream worlds but in a new system for everyone , built to be able to handle this new society instead of in our existing traditional system. Let’s put our existing traditional system (ie gender roles, the family unit etc) out of its misery so we can preserve the memory of it before it is further warped by LGBTQ and gender quota-parity-equity. If we can’t rightfully or wrongfully preserve gender roles and the traditional family unit etc, we might as well blow up those systems before they are further warped by LGBTQ and gender quota-parity equity etc.

“The struggle against sexual discrimination is linked to the struggle against class society in general for several reasons. The first is that only the abolition of class society can create the material economic basis and cultural drive sufficient to dismantle the model of the monogamous family as the only basic unit of society. By socially carrying out all the tasks that are today assigned to the sphere of the family, and mostly to women (cooking, cleaning, raising children), and by allowing the free development of individuals with access to the best material and cultural resources society can provide, it will be possible to facilitate a process by which interpersonal and family bonds are gradually freed from material necessity and correspond solely to romantic and sexual desires, thereby dissolving the oppressive norms and discriminations that exist at present.

The second reason is that the vast majority of LGBT people are workers, youth, temporary workers, unemployed, who experience a double oppression in regard to both their class, in the workplace and living (or surviving) conditions, and their identity or sexual orientation. Joining the struggles against these two forms of oppression is therefore the most natural thing, especially when we consider that the enemy is the same. Moreover, it should not be forgotten that homophobic prejudices are also fostered to divide workers – for example, to make heterosexual workers believe that, while they may be oppressed, they are still superior to the gay person (how satisfying!), in the same way that racist prejudices are nurtured

The role played by the right wing in this process is self-evident.

Whoever says that the two fronts of struggle must be separated is playing into the enemy's hands. And often, in the LGBT movement, those people promoting this stance are wealthy individuals who do not experience the material problems faced by LGBT workers and youth.

Marxism defends the unity of peoples across all gender and sexual lines in the fight against the oppressive capitalist system. But Queer Theory holds that our gender and sexual identities are a fiction produced by discourses and oppressive power in society: a learned performance. What does this idea mean for the liberation struggle? Is Queer Theory compatible with Marxism? In this talk, recorded at this year's International Marxist University, Yola Kipcak from Der Funke (Austrian section of the IMT) tackles these issues and explains the position of Marxists towards Queer Theory and the struggle against oppression

here is more:

https://www.marxist.com/marxism-vs-queer-theory.htm

We can pair the above new system with Christian Nationalism and living in a parallel Christian Society which would be a safe space for the above changes (for Christians who want to live in their own spiritual successor to our traditional system)

I blindly condone my former Christian church's ministry that helps gays. This is their mission statement:

My former Christian church's ministry compassionately walks side by side with any person whose life has been effected by same sex attraction and homosexuality. My former church's group has its members share their stories of their victories over sexual sin. This group uses biblical based wisdom and truth to show God's marriage and sexuality plan. They promote freedom that happens when people surrender their lives to Christ. They bridge the gay community and church, while offering hope rather than condemnation.   To disengage from the cultural wars over gay rights to instead focus on reaching people in the gay community one person at a time.  

[/s] "I am against gay adoption" [/s]. I don't mean that, I am kidding. I totally support gays adopting children! How can anyone possibly think such a thing would be a bad idea?  In fact, let same sex couples adopt me (though I am too old for them). Children who raised by gay parents in gay households are much 'gayer' (gayer as in the original definition of the word gay: happy, merry, excited, joyful, carefree, bright, showy) than children who are raised by straight parents in straight households.

Because progressives and liberals always challenge our social norms this has forced a good, decent thoughtful radical republican (ME) into an uncertain state where I can't be pro gay . Progressives and liberals moving further and further left and kicking out people who don't pass their purity tests create are counter productive environment where people like me are pushed further right. Many former gay people are now straight and 

At very rare times every once in a blue moon, I systematically and personal-legality wise (but not legality wise) very briefly oscillate to this view (in parenthesis) “We do live in a Constitutional Republic not a Theocracy which means give to the God-Yahweh-Jehovah Jire what is God-Yahweh-Jehovah Jires’ and give to Caesar what is Caesar’s. Praying for gays to become straight , and doing what my former Christian Church does below is giving to God-Yahweh-Jehovah Jire what is God-Yahweh-Jehovah Jire‘s while tolerating same sex marriage and at least trying to accept gay rights is giving to Caesar what is Caesar’s. Moreover gay people may be born gay (according to Dr James Dobson) which may mean their hearts have hardened which means you can’t save them. God-Yahweh-Jehovah Jire will decide what happens to them after they die .Moreover gays may be born gay (according to Dr James Dobson) which may mean their 'heart hardened' before birth, logic  says you can't save or change people whose hearts have hardened so its futile to try to change them. If so, maybe destiny has a plan to save gay people after they die if they live perfect lives like some pastors in the US say that God will save Jewish people after they die if they stay true to the Torah and Judaism. Republicanism and Conservatism has always been about so supporting same sex marriage is a Republican Conservative thing to do if you look at it that way.”

However each very rare time once in a blue moon I systematically and personal-legality wise very briefly oscillate to those thoughts above, I remember these articles:https://web.archive.org/web/20160717222616/https://thefederalist.com/2015/05/01/4-huge-differences-between-abraham-lincoln-and-modern-liberals/ ,  https://www.hrc.org/resources/what-does-the-bible-say-about-homosexuality  https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2012/01/a-challenge-for-libertarians-against-federal-recognition-of-same-sex-marriage/. and the fact that possibly in the distant future the Left Wing Progressives, Liberals and Democrats will turn on gays and say that being gay is wrong and that gay rights (including same sex marriage) are wrong from a Left Wing, Liberal and Progressive perspective and I systematically and personal-legality wise go back each time to having my exact views on the gay issue that I have in this blog

I strongly do not support gay people having sex with each other. But I won't stop them from doing it.  They have free will to do such things.  I also do not support people being gay.  There are probably hundreds of things about me and things that I do that nearly all gay people would not support, so I don't I don't feel guilty about having these 

I don't think that those gay night club raids in New Jersey (and similar incidents elsewhere) were homophobic .I don't think the majority of those gays arrested via those raids were arrested for being gay (or if it was a factor, it was a small factor). I am against criminalizing gay acts

I am proud to be straight. I support straight pride

Wmn

I support Bodily autonomy for women (including Reproductive and sexual rights, Women's health ie freedom from abuse, freedom of movement, security of person, etc)

I am a Postfeminist, I support a society which is no longer defined by rigid gender roles and expressions

Women should not go to prison unless they commit a violent crime

Toxic Masculinity isn't an issue with me though I am not crazy about it

MeToo should adopt the innocent til proven guilty guideline along with forgiving sexual abusers. MeToo also is filled with hypocricy which makes it hard not to see it as a partisan hack job.  In fact, I am cool with Rose McGowan's brand of MeToo as a glimmer of what the movement should be like

I empathize with Radical Lesbian feminist and similar feminist hostility to trans people. In particular I empathize with these views of theirs:  

Trans people facilitate gender norms which breed sexism and more against women and trans people give off ‘we are dupes’ vibes. 

Trans people engage in savage body mutilation (ie sex reassignment surgery which if it is really violence must be confronted) which deeply concerns me. It is wrong for young women for example who may one day be feminists to get sex hormones as a child to be a boy, never getting a chance to break the male patriarchy as a biological female feminist

The whole big med are trying to medicalize gender identity and normalize it and that is wrong on so many levels.

If we are trying to destroy the patriarchy which we should, making women in man’s image (trans women) is an impediment to that at worst and complicates that at best. It gives biological men an anti feminist ally (trans women) which makes it harder for women to destroy the patriarchy to make all sexist men to be non bigoted toward women since feminists have to fight two fronts (trans and men). Maybe in the 19th century or early to early mid 20th century men ‘making women in their image’ could have forced men to not be sexist due to creating their ideal women (trans women) but that ship had long sailed and we need to move forward instead of going backwards by destroying the patriarchy that has men create women in their sexist image. Trans people need to find different and new ways to help us do that

It is almost sick if you look at it that way (not that we should, just saying). Trans people appropriate women’s bodies and non intrusively assault (ymmv) women by becoming a women merrily by cosmetic or a few mutalating changes. 

Being a woman is not a feeling, there is more to that. Women are oppressed due to biology, not identity 

Trans people need to change our society, not their bodies.

Moreover trans people are trying to erase lesbians which is wrong so Radical Lesbian Feminists and similar feminists fighting against trans people is a way to prevent lesbian erasure.