Polemic

I support Georgia's voting id laws and Texas's voting id laws. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/2/21/18230009/voter-id-laws-fraud-turnout-study-research

(disclaimer) However, so I am not labeled a racist or fascist, I am forced to say that begrudgingly Republicans should toxically encourage and help all poor and BIPOC+ people in Georgia and Texas (who claim this law makes it harder for them to vote) to get the required ids and get transported to the polling places so they have no excuse to complain about these new laws. This means volunteering to drive people who can't get ids in those states to get their ids and to get to the voting places.  

To be fair, we should be doing that anyway. We should be trying to convert millions of BIPOC+ Democrat voters (from all states but especially battle ground states) to our side through things like Blexit or by trying to win them to our side . 

https://www.elitedaily.com/life/motivation/why-hating-people-can-be-good-soul/686185

I am mixed to third political position on Blexit. I feel if the Democrats keep using BIPOC+ for votes ,BIPOC+ will rebel against them and come to our side. If we lure a lot of BIPOC+ away before that happens, we won't get all those BIPOC+ voters we would have gotten if we waited. But if we keep having issues over voting laws, we may not be able afford to wait

However, if we can that thousands of Republicans to get jobs as poll workers in Georgia and Texas to personally make sure there is no election fraud (NO harassment, just for obsessive checking of the voter rolls or to see and report anything that could be suspicious) , I would then switch and call for Georgia and Texas to go back to their pre 2020s voting laws under that condition.

I support strict, non photo ids along with there being no requirement to register to vote (like in North Dakota). 

However, if the voter doesn't provide the strict non photo id, then they I believe if either they show three or more of the following: current utility bill, current bank statement, check issued by a federal, state or local government, paycheck, document issued by a federal, state or local government, authorized university document for voters using a student photo ID card OR if they meet one or two of the requirements above AND show a written or verbal confirmation of name, address and date of birth along with signing the poll book, then I would be fine with them being allowed to vote

In states that have non strict non photo ids, for those particular states I do support people being required to register to vote

I refuse to comment on whether I believe the 2020 US Presidential election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden. It is so obvious to anyone with if even a half of brain if the 2020 US Presidential election was stolen by the Democrats and Joe Biden or not, I feel embarrassed having to state my opinion on that.  

It's as embarrassing as me having to state my opinion on whether I believe the sky is blue, whether I believe the Earth is not flat, whether I believe astronauts really went to the moon, whether I believe the 2009 Afghanistan election was stolen, whether I believe the 1923 Chinese presidential election was stolen, whether I believe the 1960 Iranian general election was stolen, whether I believe the 1946 Romanian general election was stolen etc

George Orwell's quote about how people knows who is controlling them by who they can't criticize rings true today due our corrupt, Globalist and Cultrual Marxist leaders which includes George Soros

Cultural marxists, globalists have control over us and we can't criticize them without being cancelled, censored or silenced. They slander us and our views by using smear words such as ‘disinformation’ or ‘misinformation’  to delegitimize them. They try to shut down our free speech to protect their far left bubble. They try to control the truth by defining what the truth is and what ‘disinformation/misinformation’ is , complete with their real life Ministry of Truth ‘Disinformation Board’

You can tell there is an evil cabal of liberals trying to control the truth because they slander anyone who doesn’t agree with their views  https://katehon.com/en/article/liberalism-20

Snopes and Media Bias Fact Check help us realize that right wing media uses loaded language and exaggerations to make Democrats seem worse than they are. If right wing media was as honest on that stuff as Snopes and Media bias fact check, we would still fight against Democrats but without the anger and in a diplomatic but no less firm way

The Government’s job is to make all different people of all backgrounds in the US get along with each other, and be able to live together. I want the Government to put it positively like I said it as that would help offset the beaurcracy and moral police stating of the Government getting involved with hate crime laws, anti discrimination laws, and the like.

I support George W Bush’s pre 9/11 way of handling Israel snd international things as noted here

Yes Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. No he is not a Muslim. However I believe people taking a stupid position in a debate like that Barack Obama was born in Kenya (even though he wasn't and the people who take that position don't believe it themselves) can increase that debaters debate skills where they can debate things they actually believe  effectively. Taking such stupid positions in debates is a postmodern way of debating, as Ryan Wash did a few years ago

 agree with some aspects of Tucker Carlson's views last year about how Democrats are using migrants to vote D in order to help them win elections but with a grain of salt.

I would like to add, first off the Democrats doing that is not illegal (though shady) and is very brilliant. It shows Democrats have creativity and maybe that creativity can be used in the future to compromise with them on a few issues. It's migrants of all races and ethnicities they are using, moreover some Hispanics are considered white (ie Nick Fuentes).  It's not non whites replacing whites, it's Democrats of all races and ethnicities outnumbering Republicans for various reasons, migration is one but other reasons include academia, better marketing by Democrats, MSM and corporate America being liberal, people being bored and wanting change etc.

Secondly, instead of criticizing Democrats for doing that ,maybe Republicans-conservatives can take a page out of that Democrat playbook and import conservative migrants of all races and ethnicities who hold conservative values into the US to vote Republican as it would be an effective way to counter that.

Finally, the Great replacement theory isn't true. It's a myth . But I do believe that due to the nature of Democrats, Liberals and Progressives and their views, that unconsciously or systematically (not intentionally) ,the Democrats hold back on being strict on migration which causes what Tucker Carlson said in September 2021 to happen

I don't mind being in the minority in the US. In an alternate reality where the GRT was true, the BIPOC+ who 'replaced' whites in that reality would eventually be 'replaced' themselves, so karma would hit them like a ton of bricks

In 2003, John Judis and Ruy Teixeira wrote The Emerging Democratic Majority. In this book, they said that Democrats were building a new electoral coalition where white America is supplanted by multicultural (multiracial and multi ethnic) society.  

Nine years later, in 2012, The Washington Post wrote "The story of this election will be all about demographics... Rather than reverting to the older, whiter, more male version (of America's electorate) Republicans had hoped for, it continues to be defined by what Ron Brownstein has called the 'coalition of the ascendant' -- minorities, young voters, and college educated whites, particularly women"

In 2013, the Center for American Progress said, "Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future."

But it's so obvious this is the case, that it is an insult to Americans to deny it. Joe Biden told blacks after he 'won' the 2020 Presidential Election 'you had my back now I got yours's. It's the same with Democrats/Liberals and illegals.

The Democrats want to tie Republican positions with White Supremacy .They do this to take voters away from us.  It is toxic politics but it is a lie.  Liberal politics don't care about the truth, they use all tools to destroy us

I also can see where Carlson is coming from about how the ADL is hypocritical for criticizing him on what he said above but not Israel for similar policies. I plead the fifth on whether I agree with him on that.

However, the ADL is like left to far left on every issue EXCEPT Israel which they are refreshingly conservative on. I love the fact that the ADL is good on Israel which shows they aren't afraid to have a conservative view despite them being liberal

So it's better not to call the ADL out over their alleged and perceived 'hypocrisy' on Israel hence we accidently push the ADL to the left on Israel (which is one of the few views they are conservative on).

There is an obvious liberal media biased in the media and that is a fact. Most reporters and editors are liberal. Only far left cultists would deny that fact. From Mark Twain who had a prophetic vision about today's liberal MSM 'If you don't read the newspaper (or news sites), you're uninformed. If you read the (liberal) newspaper (or news site), you're mis-informed'   

We have a state run media. The odds that conservatives are as wrong as much as they are portrayed by the state run media to be wrong are so low, no one would take that bet.  Abortion, gun rights, LGBTQ+, Jan 6, wokeness, migration, etc. If the conservatives really are 'wrong' on the vast majority of views, why do they keep winning? why aren't they seen as a fringe party? We know the answer

In general, if the left will become unhinged about a conservative viewpoint, and go on attack mode against said conservatives, that's how you know that conservative viewpoint is correct.

MSM and liberals use loaded language (more than conservatives), they have liberal catchphrases that work well turn people to their cause 'stand with Trayvon' ,'pro democracy', 'Love trumps Hate' etc. 

Liberal bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AReliable_sources%2FPerennial_sources&diff=prev&oldid=1058700530

https://www.commentary.org/articles/bari-weiss/resist-woke-revolution/?s=04

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/565489-chuck-todd-liberal-bias-doesnt-exist-in-media-it-absolutely-does

We need to fight against Corporatism to stop these far left Corporations from taking over our country and world with their monopolies and far left influence. Robert Reich has some good ideas to fight Corporatism. 

Corporations are starting to run our country, they are now influencing state laws, donating heavily to politics etc. Corporations need to be forced to go back to being neutral. We need to boycott these liberal corporations and if they don't budge we need to shut these corporations down forever and destroy their products. We have to make them pay for siding with liberetards on every damn issue. The reason? Most major corporations are the commerce arm of the Democrat Party. They are mostly liberal. Some corporations we need to boycott include Ben & Jerry's, Uber, Lyft, Apple etc. If any conservative uses those liberal services or products they are a traitor and are kicked out of the Republican party forever.

Many of our fiscal problems are caused by multinational corporations. Transnational corporations run our world, and are a growing threat to our democracy due to the power and influence they have in politics and consumer culture.   

We've got to stop this Bolshevik Big Business or force these Bolshevik corporations to admit they are liberal. Make sure these corporations learn their lesson:  https://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_corporate_tyranny#cite_note-461

The US is controlled by corporations that in some ways harms our country or work against our country’s interest. We need remove the hostile parts of those corporations before they develop into Oligarchies.

This is from 2002, https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/805656/posts?q=1&;page=21   Sound familiar?    Like a prophecy.  See all those NGOs? . https://accountabletech.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Twitter-Advertisers.pdf They are left NGOs, just like in the link   Left NGOs and corporations are in bed, Left NGOs are the reason our country is getting worse and worse. We must counter left NGOs by creating or expanding right NGOs and by turning those left NGOs to our side . Shift the overton window right for liberal NGOs like NARAL, Black Lives Matter, Amnesty International, etc and corporations and the MSM will follow.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a leftist organization and has a liberal bias . Anyone who says otherwise is a fool. It slanders many people or goes overboard. They twist things like they did with Stephen Miller. They use association fallacies.  They were fine up until a few decades ago but now they are a wing of the DNC

Wikipedia has a very obvious liberal bias. But it is through blacklisting conservative sources, and banning conservative users. Wikipedia is also woke, and we need to counter Wikipedia's wokeness. It has a more worldwide user base as Jimbo Wales said but that is no excuse. Wikipedia was fine until the early to mid 2010s. 

Politicians should not make decisions based on emotions but based on rational thinking. 

If any academic silver spoon snob know it all tries to say Conservatives aren't as 'smart' as Liberals, after you tell that soy boy or soy girl commie Marxist this:

More and more extreme liberal views have been associated with an ever growing higher risk of having many types of mental illnesses. The Liberals' brains (ie amygdala) are wired in such a way that leftist liberals are more risk taking and reckless with childlike optimism that is blind than Conservatives' brains, who are wired to be more cautious and risk averse than liberals. What this means is that this brain wiring causes liberals to be more 'open' to or embracing potentially harmful things like illegal migration, Cultural Marxism, Communism etc that Conservatives wouldn't be open to or embrace. This 'openness' to embrace such risky political views without fear of consequences is consistent with psychopathatic behavior.

party positions

I view the modern establishment GOP ,RINO movement Conservatives (ie Madison Cawthorn) ,Conservatives and Republicans as decrepit and corrupt and I repudiate them. I am fine with social conservatism

I believe that the government/state should stay out of enforcing moral changes in at least some to more than most situations. Moral evolution can happen many times apart of the government/state and relations between people can emerge with freedom from the government/state. Most relationships in life should not be characterized as conflict as the left and right might have it. It's good to have mutual and humane respect for others as individuals.   It's also good to do positive and unselfish things without having to grapple with the political ramifications of doing those positive things.

Mark Twain said it best "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect"

The Democrat-Republican 1960s 'party switch' never happened. Republicans, Conservatives and Paleoconservatives have always been the non racist, non antisemetic, inclusive political party (its what the Republican party was founded on in the 1850s), while Democrats have always been the racist, antisemetic political party, hence why I am proud to be a Radical Republican who is Conservative

The Republicans in the 1980s were a great political party. Back then Republicans were seen as go getter yuppies and business people. On Family Ties for example, Alex, who was a Republican was a small-government, pro-capitalist libertarian at heart was a great person unlike a lot of the Republicans of today. Alex was hip and cool. This article puts it better than I can http://web.archive.org/web/20191011195307/https://www.cracked.com/article_26594_the-classic-sitcom-that-looks-completely-insane-in-2019.html

The Republicans in the early to mid 1990s were also a great party. Uncle Phil was a great Republican. He rightfully belived in Affirmative action and fair housing for his community and he was moderately conservative on other issues while rightfully having faith in institutions like the courts.

I may appear to support Donald Trump publicly, but behind the scenes I donate to anti Trump candidates and try to lower the MAGA influence. My reasons are two fold and come from both directions. 

1) Donald Trump is too liberal for me on criminal justice reform, gay issues (or not exactly like me on them), too zionist for me (I am not against him being zionist but he goes too far), too pro drug for me and a few/rare amount of other things. 

2) I don't think Trump and his brand are electable, and many of his candidates and Trump himself are too conservative for me in most areas. 

I believe a real January 6th commission should have all truly independent , non politically partisan and ideally outside investigators on it at minimum so it's not a partisan hack jobs he merely presenting that as an example of an absurd post-modernist argument?

The Stop the Steal protestors protesting outside the Capitol were vastly peaceful and a bit provacotive. They had a right to protest. It sure as heck wasn't an 'insurrection' 

The January 6th 2021 protests were controversial and heated. It's hard to believe that those particular people (the ones who didn't enter the Capitol) were trying to stop the transfer of power . Even the protestors who did enter the capitol didn’t seem like they were going to do an insurrection since if they were going to do an insurrection they would have had more weapons, a better plan, and a different strategy then just rushing into the Capital empty handed into a wall of cops and people. The people who went into the Capitol, I won't throw the book at, because I wasn't there. If they were trying to stop the transfer of power, they sure as heck didn't look like it , as they were so disorganized. If someone is going to stop the transfer of power, I think they would use sophisticated methods, as opposed to drinking a beer in Nancy Pelosi's office.  Do people actually believe that the 'Capitol stormers' thought that by rushing into the Capitol they would have been able to stop the transfer of power?  Do people think those protestors were that naive, ignorant and stupid?  Really?

We have to admit that at least some of those protestors who entered the Capitol were not psychos and and at the very least somewhat legit protesting (and had no intention of stopping the transfer of power). 

My gut tells me the protestors who didn't enter the Capitol were mostly to vastly annoying but passive protestors and the ones who tried to get in the Capitol did so based on a false signal by Capital police (they thought they saw the Capitol police wave them in when they weren't waved in, I can relate as I accidently went into my friend's house years ago after I thought that she said 'come in' when she didn't) When protestors are heated, and there is that much emotion involved, it's easy to mistake something for a hand wave that tells you you can go in.

Some of those protestors who did go into the Capitol were convicted in the court of law so legally those particular protestors were wrong based on that at least. 

However, since I wasn't there I have no idea if they were mostly to vastly peaceful protests or if the ones who did go into the Capitol were mostly peaceful protesting and not trying to stop the transfer of power or were the second coming of the War of the worlds martians, and I think its best to move on from that and put it behind us.  I don't believe the January 6 2021 protests (including the ones inside of the Capitol) were that much worse than what Joe Biden did in the early 1960s at the Capitol when he trespassed at the Capitol himself or AOC's takeover of Nancy Pelosi' office in 2018 or the anti life protests by Democrats at the Capitol where AOC got arrested. The January 6 2021 protest at the Capitol was to many people I respect, a relative ‘peacekeeping’ (I know that is a stretch) outing compared to the Weather Underground's 1971 terrorist attack on the Capitol.

If you think they were terrorists, read these, sounds like what our government did to the Jan 6'ers  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plotshttps://theintercept.com/2015/02/26/fbi-manufacture-plots-terrorism-isis-grave-threats  Not that I give a damn because frankly I don’t

p

The few bad apples from both sides who caused havoc on January 6 2021 went too far. They need to get mental help and support. No one is perfect. It's good to see passion on both sides about politics. 

https://web.archive.org/web/20210710204349/https://www.zerohedge.com/political/daryl-cooper-why-trump-supporters-are-pissed-and-dont-trust-anything

The vast vast vast majority of Republicans are good people (and even some liberals too). If deluded Liberals would live in our world for a bit they'd come to that conclusion and realize the fake news MSM is trying to demonize us with smears the same way they did to Muslims in the early 2000s. https://nypost.com/2017/10/21/the-other-half-of-america-that-the-liberal-media-doesnt-cover/

The virtual (give or take) majority of the alt right has no idea what authentic American conservatism rooted in constitutional principles is all about and they should embrace that authenic American conservatism and ditch their brand of 'conservatism' or leave the party.

I do admit that the true fringe of the far right and the true fringe of the Democrat party (ie the actual and open bigots on both fringes) are obviously wrong, close minded, ignorant, shallow and mentally impaired. They are wrong to be shallow and to judge books by their cover.  Identity has nothing to do with how someone is. Judge people by actions and their character not identity. This is sound advice and logical.  The violent bigots on both fringes need double help: to stop being bigots and to stop being violent. 

Instead of trying to help the allege 'extremists (ie White Nationalists)' in the Republican party, the Democrats want to trash them and push them away, like they don't matter.  Democrats don't even want to help them or convert them to their side. So it should be no surprise that is country is as divided as it is due to that

The best way to deal with bigots in our party is to privately confront them to help them change through tough love . Or we can help those bigots change like liberals try to help pedos and criminals change. if liberals can do that why can't we do that for our side?

If there was a Civil War in the US, I'd turn both sides against me to give them something to unite over. We might be heading to a Civil War but I am anti war and thus I don't want there to be a civil war.

Bad Apples

I am obviously against ANTIFA that it goes without saying

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views. Liberals should embrace the diversity of viewpoints instead of closing their hears and screaming 'bigot phobe racist blah blah blah'

Generally liberals are evil.They are in it to divide us all,by every characteristic people are a part of.Race-ethnicity,gender,religion,political persuasion,etc.And this is a goal for only one reason-to weaken us as a Nation.It's up to the people to put a stop to this.Because as it becomes more and more clearer by the day. and as much as I hate saying this, this IS a war, and this is a war that is being waged on the spiritual level, affecting all other levels. People who deny thistruth inre:Spirit,are not equipped to help fight in this battle.That is,to help themselves or the joint well-being of We the People. More of us need to be awake and aware of what is happening in our country as opposed to being merely PO'd at "the other side",which is what we are being manipulated to do .This attack has been on for decades, and thoug

Twitter is a liberal echo chamber. See how they trash Chris Pratt for more proof (as if we need proof). See how they rage quit over Elon Musk buying Twitter, how so many have twitter handles with liberal talking points. Many of those twitter users (up to 20 percent) may be fake which is sad but makes sense if you think about it.

I am against the Democrats censuring Krysten Sinema. Shame on those fascists for censuring them.

From WP "Misinformation can be true, but is selective in what is communicated such that the other person will come to desired conclusions"

I believe we need to build a parallel Christian society to counter this Cosmopolitan-Globalizationist Anarchist-Marxist one (ie like alt tech)  

People by their human nature like change over the status quo, because change is more fun while the status quo is boring. So that's what us conservatives are up against vs liberals/progressives

Being racist and anti semetic is wrong but no worse than any sin (but its harder to kick than other sins for some bigots). But people make non violent and non terroristic racists and anti semites out to be as bad as baby killers, 9/11 terrorists, pedophiles, lepers or rapists/sexual abusers and that type of exaggeration is wrong. If those people are otherwise good people, don't spew their bigotry to BIPOC+ and help others (including BIPOC+) who cares if they are trolls? Look at Barack Obama and what he said about his grandmother for example. 

Being racist and anti semetic is bigoted, shallow, picky, petty, small minded and ignorant. 

It also is unfair to be racist in that it hates people for reasons they can't control. Judging a book by its cover is a logical fallacy. But people can discriminate against outside of identity for things they also can't control (where they were raised, how rich they are , what family they belong to, what type of car they have, what type of job they have). All of that unfair discrimination needs to end.

People have a right to be wrong. That the right to personally discriminate--that is make your own decisions, based upon your own lights--is the very essence of liberty (we would have to change the nature of our country to fix that right); while Governmental denial of that right, goes to the very essence of tyranny (see what I wrote above above). 

Humans are picky by nature; people tend to want to be around other people who are like them. No matter how unjust and sad that may appear to some, it is intuitive and part of our genes and makeup. If gays can be 'born gay' , why can't humans either be born bigoted or susceptible to being bigoted like some humans are born to be susceptible to being alcoholics

Maybe stuff like the Antiracist Baby book and antiracist training being used on infants and young toddlers can cure humans of that pickiness so that humans do want to equally be around people who are not like them as they want be around people who are like them. 

I would oscillate between empathizing with (but not supporting or tolerating) and half heartingly tolerating the Antiracist Baby book and antiracist training being used on infants and young toddlers ONLY if those things can really cure humans of their pickiness so that humans want to equally be around people who are not like them as they want be around people who are like them (but I would not want those antiracist tools or any antiracist tools to be used on children who aren't infants or young toddlers, and also not on preteens, teens or adults)

If those 'antiracist'' tools don't accomplish that, we need to book burn the Antiracist Baby books and ban antiracist training, in particular for babies and young children.

It would be nice if humans can evolve one day where we can not be picky about who were are more comfortable being around, but it appears to be the case now. 

Maybe if our society learns to stop judging people on how they dress, and similar things, it will make us finally not be like what I wrote above, but I digress.

As long as things are like they are now, we can't crucify racists and anti semeties unless they do hate crimes/terrorism or try to get others do hate crimes/terrorism (or if their bigotry fuels hate crimes like Charlottesville murder of Heather Heyer or Charleston)   

But to be fair, liberals cause hate crimes through their rhetoric too, look at the Family Research Council shooting for proof.

Democrats, Liberals and Progressives all force themselves to have the same views so they can label any views they don’t have as ‘Right wing’. This causes them to be able to stifle debate or cancel or censor simply by writing that said views are ‘right wing’ which delegitimizes the opposition. See this for more